Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Marketing (2023): the Director failed to provide a sufficient analysis of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director failed to provide a sufficient analysis of the evidence for several criteria, including the claim of a major, internationally recognized award (Cannes Lions Awards). The Director also improperly defined the beneficiary's field as 'chief executive' rather than 'marketing,' leading to an erroneous assessment of the evidence. The case was sent back for re-evaluation with instructions to properly define the field and fully analyze the submitted documentation.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
One-Time Achievement (Major Award) Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Published Material About The Individual Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary Or Other Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.