Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Martial Arts (2024): the AAO found that the Director erred in concluding the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the Director erred in concluding the petitioner did not meet the requirement to continue work in his area of expertise. The AAO also found that the petitioner satisfied the 'published material' criterion, bringing the total number of met criteria to at least three, thus requiring the case to be sent back for a final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Continue Work In The Area Of Expertise Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others Published Material About The Individual
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.