Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Medical Cosmetology (2024): the Director's denial was withdrawn because the AAO found
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director's denial was withdrawn because the AAO found the petitioner met at least two additional criteria on appeal. The petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance through a patented method for facial rejuvenation and a leading or critical role through her work as a top-tier trainer for a major pharmaceutical company. The case was remanded for a new decision consistent with these findings.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Memberships Published Material About Petitioner Judging Original Contributions Leading Or Critical Role High Salary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.