remanded EB-1A Case: Medical Research
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, concluding the petitioner only met two of the required three evidentiary criteria. Upon review, the AAO found that the petitioner did in fact meet a third criterion, 'leading or critical role,' based on evidence of his significant contributions to a transplant research department at a distinguished hospital. Because the petitioner established eligibility under at least three criteria, the case was remanded for a final merits determination on whether the evidence demonstrates sustained acclaim at the very top of the field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.