Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Medical Research (2021): the Director's initial decision was procedurally flawed
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's initial decision was procedurally flawed. The AAO found that the Director failed to provide a detailed analysis for several criteria, did not make a final determination on the 'scholarly articles' criterion which was previously acknowledged, and did not address the petitioner's request to consider comparable evidence. The case was sent back for further review and a new, properly reasoned decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Display Of Work Leading Or Critical Role Comparable Evidence
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.