Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Medicine (2023): the Director's decision was procedurally flawed
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's decision was procedurally flawed. The AAO found that the Director's denial misstated the petitioner's medical specialty, appeared to confuse the record with another case, overlooked submitted evidence, and improperly applied the 'extensive documentation' standard to individual criteria rather than the final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Commanding A High Salary Or Other Significantly High Remuneration Published Material About The Petitioner Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.