remanded EB-1A Case: Medicine
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The Director denied the petition, finding the petitioner met only two of the required three criteria. The AAO disagreed with the Director's assessment of the 'original scientific contributions of major significance' criterion, finding that the petitioner provided sufficient evidence of her research's importance through citations and expert testimony. As the petitioner now met the three-criteria threshold, the case was remanded for a final merits determination on whether she has sustained national or international acclaim.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.