Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Neuroscience (2024): the Director's denial was conclusory and did not adequately
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial was conclusory and did not adequately address the petitioner's evidence regarding her original contributions of major significance. The Director failed to properly consider expert testimony letters and evidence of high citation counts for her published work. The case was sent back for re-evaluation of this criterion and the issuance of a new, well-reasoned decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.