remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Neuroscience
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial was conclusory and did not adequately address the petitioner's evidence regarding her original contributions of major significance. The Director failed to properly consider expert testimony letters and evidence of high citation counts for her published work. The case was sent back for re-evaluation of this criterion and the issuance of a new, well-reasoned decision.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.