Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Neurotoxicology (2022): the Director denied the petition, finding the petitioner
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director denied the petition, finding the petitioner met only two of the three claimed criteria. On appeal, the AAO reviewed the evidence for the 'original scientific contributions' criterion, including expert letters and media reports, and concluded that the petitioner did satisfy this third criterion. Therefore, the case was remanded for a final merits determination based on the totality of the evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.