remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Nuclear Medicine
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the Director erred in evaluating the 'high salary' criterion. The AAO concluded the petitioner did provide sufficient evidence to meet this criterion, thus satisfying the minimum threshold of three evidentiary criteria. The case was sent back to the Director to conduct the final merits determination, which was not previously performed.
Criteria Discussed
Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Roles Published Material About The Petitioner Original Contributions Of Major Significance High Salary Or Remuneration Judge Of The Work Of Others
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.