Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Nuclear Medicine (2023): the AAO found that the Director erred in evaluating the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the Director erred in evaluating the 'high salary' criterion. The AAO concluded the petitioner did provide sufficient evidence to meet this criterion, thus satisfying the minimum threshold of three evidentiary criteria. The case was sent back to the Director to conduct the final merits determination, which was not previously performed.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Roles Published Material About The Petitioner Original Contributions Of Major Significance High Salary Or Remuneration Judge Of The Work Of Others
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.