Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Packaging Engineering (2023): the Director initially denied the petition, finding that
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, finding that the petitioner had not met any of the required evidentiary criteria. On appeal, the AAO determined that the petitioner did, in fact, provide sufficient evidence to meet at least three criteria: judging the work of others, making original scientific or business-related contributions of major significance, and playing a leading or critical role. The case was therefore remanded for the Director to complete the final merits determination based on the totality of the evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Individual Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.