remanded EB-1A Case: Packaging Engineering
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, finding that the petitioner had not met any of the required evidentiary criteria. On appeal, the AAO determined that the petitioner did, in fact, provide sufficient evidence to meet at least three criteria: judging the work of others, making original scientific or business-related contributions of major significance, and playing a leading or critical role. The case was therefore remanded for the Director to complete the final merits determination based on the totality of the evidence.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.