remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Plant Pathology
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The case was remanded for a new decision to be entered. The Director originally denied the petition after concluding the petitioner met only two of the required three evidentiary criteria (judging and authorship of scholarly articles). The AAO conducted a de novo review, agreeing with the Director on several criteria but ultimately remanding the case for a new decision consistent with its own analysis.
Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Alien Judge Of The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.