Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Plant Pathology (2024): the case was remanded for a new decision to be entered
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The case was remanded for a new decision to be entered. The Director originally denied the petition after concluding the petitioner met only two of the required three evidentiary criteria (judging and authorship of scholarly articles). The AAO conducted a de novo review, agreeing with the Director on several criteria but ultimately remanding the case for a new decision consistent with its own analysis.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Alien Judge Of The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.