remanded
EB-1A
remanded EB-1A Case: Research
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the petitioner satisfied the 'scholarly articles' criterion, meeting the minimum of three evidentiary criteria. The AAO also concluded the petitioner provided sufficient evidence of intent to continue working in their field, thereby overcoming the director's initial reasons for denial. The case was sent back for a final merits determination on the totality of the evidence.
Criteria Discussed
Published Material Leading Or Critical Role Original Contributions Scholarly Articles Membership Intent To Continue Work
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.