Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Research (2024): the AAO found that the petitioner satisfied the 'scholarly
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the petitioner satisfied the 'scholarly articles' criterion, meeting the minimum of three evidentiary criteria. The AAO also concluded the petitioner provided sufficient evidence of intent to continue working in their field, thereby overcoming the director's initial reasons for denial. The case was sent back for a final merits determination on the totality of the evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material Leading Or Critical Role Original Contributions Scholarly Articles Membership Intent To Continue Work
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.