Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Security Consultant: the director's denial was procedurally deficient
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the director's denial was procedurally deficient. The AAO agreed with the petitioner's counsel that the director's decision was vague and ambiguous, failing to specify which criteria the petitioner failed to establish or explain the deficiencies in the evidence. This prevented the petitioner from filing a meaningful appeal, so the case was sent back for a new, properly articulated decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Original Contributions Of Major Significance Leading Or Critical Role High Salary Or Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.