Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Software Development (2022): the AAO agreed with the Director's findings that the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The AAO agreed with the Director's findings that the petitioner met two criteria (original contributions and leading/critical role) but failed to meet two others (awards and published material). The awards were given to the petitioner's company, not to him personally, and the submitted article was not sufficiently about him. The case was remanded for a new decision to be issued consistent with the AAO's analysis.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Awards Published Material About The Individual Original Contributions Of Major Significance Leading Or Critical Roles For Organizations With Distinguished Reputations
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.