remanded EB-1A Case: Technology Management
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director improperly narrowed the Petitioner's field of endeavor to 'electrical engineering and materials science.' The AAO found that the Petitioner had consistently claimed a multidisciplinary field as a Chief Technology Officer (CTO) from the initial filing. The Director's misclassification of the field led to an incorrect evaluation of the evidence, necessitating a remand for a new decision based on the correct field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.