Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Technology Management (2022): the Director improperly narrowed the Petitioner's field of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director improperly narrowed the Petitioner's field of endeavor to 'electrical engineering and materials science.' The AAO found that the Petitioner had consistently claimed a multidisciplinary field as a Chief Technology Officer (CTO) from the initial filing. The Director's misclassification of the field led to an incorrect evaluation of the evidence, necessitating a remand for a new decision based on the correct field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Published Material About The Petitioner Judging The Work Of Others Scholarly Articles Original Contributions Of Major Significance Leading Or Critical Role High Salary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.