remanded EB-1A Case: Traditional Chinese Medicine
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found that the petitioner did meet the initial evidentiary criteria for original contributions of major significance and participation as a judge, contrary to the Director's findings. The AAO determined the Director had imposed evidentiary requirements beyond the regulations and that the evidence, such as the commercialization and licensing of the petitioner's therapies, was sufficient. The case was sent back for a final merits determination.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.