remanded EB-1A

remanded EB-1A Case: Urban Game Design

📅 Date unknown 👤 Individual 📂 Urban Game Design

Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.

No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.

Draft your EB-1A petition free →

Decision Summary

The AAO found that the Director improperly applied extra-regulatory standards when denying two criteria. The AAO determined the petitioner did in fact meet the criteria for judging the work of others and for displaying work at artistic exhibitions, bringing the total number of satisfied criteria to three. The case was remanded for the Director to conduct the final merits determination, which was not previously performed as the initial evidentiary threshold was not considered met.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Viii) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Iv) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Vii) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(I) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(V)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure

MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.