Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Vaccine Industry (2024): the AAO determined the petitioner met a second criterion
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO determined the petitioner met a second criterion (high remuneration) in addition to the one (leading or critical role) acknowledged by the Director. The Director had denied the petition for not meeting the required three criteria. Since the AAO's finding changed the number of criteria met, the case was sent back for a new decision consistent with this analysis.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Membership In Associations Published Material About The Alien Original Contributions Of Major Significance Leading Or Critical Role High Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.