remanded EB-1A Case: Water Treatment
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The Director initially found the Petitioner met only two of the required three evidentiary criteria. On appeal, the AAO determined the Petitioner also met the criterion for original contributions of major significance, based on his development of a novel wastewater treatment system and a national pool operator certification program in Turkey. Because the Petitioner now meets the three-criteria threshold, the case was remanded for a final merits determination.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1A petition with AAO-aware structure
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.