Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Water Treatment (2024): the Director initially found the Petitioner met only two of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director initially found the Petitioner met only two of the required three evidentiary criteria. On appeal, the AAO determined the Petitioner also met the criterion for original contributions of major significance, based on his development of a novel wastewater treatment system and a national pool operator certification program in Turkey. Because the Petitioner now meets the three-criteria threshold, the case was remanded for a final merits determination.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Petitioner Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Scientific Or Business-Related Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.