Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Web Development And Digital Marketing (2024): the AAO found the Director erred on two key points
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the AAO found the Director erred on two key points. The AAO determined the petitioner did provide clear evidence of her intent to continue working in her field in the U.S. and also established that she performed in a leading role for her company, which had a distinguished reputation, thus meeting a third evidentiary criterion. The case was sent back for a final merits determination based on these findings.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Intent To Continue Working In The Field Published Materials About The Petitioner Judging The Work Of Others Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Awards Leading Or Critical Role For A Distinguished Organization
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.