Remanded
EB-1A
EB-1A Remanded — Writing (2021): the Director's denial was based on a flawed final merits
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's denial was based on a flawed final merits determination, focusing on peripheral issues and failing to provide the petitioner an opportunity to submit crucial evidence. The case was sent back to allow the petitioner to produce documentary evidence of acclaim that predates his prosecution, which is necessary to distinguish recognition for his work from publicity surrounding his legal situation.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Published Material About The Individual In Professional Or Major Media Participation As A Judge Of The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Sustained National Or International Acclaim
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.