EB-1A Sustained โ Advertising (2017): the AAO determined the petitioner met five evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined the petitioner met five evidentiary criteria, contrary to the Director's finding of only two. The AAO found that the petitioner's nationally recognized awards, high salary, participation as a judge, leading role in distinguished organizations, and published material about him demonstrated sustained national acclaim. Considering the totality of the evidence, the AAO concluded the petitioner proved he is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.