sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Applied Physics
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner successfully demonstrated that he meets at least two of the regulatory criteria. Specifically, new evidence submitted on appeal established the significance of his participation as a reviewer for the National Science Foundation (NSF), and letters from experts confirmed his original contributions of major significance to the field of spintronics.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.