EB-1A Sustained โ Artificial Intelligence Technology (2020): the Director initially denied the petition, finding the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, finding the petitioner only met two of the required three evidentiary criteria. The AAO sustained the appeal, concluding that the petitioner also met the criterion for original contributions of major significance based on evidence of his patents, testimonial letters from industry experts, and the impact of his proprietary technology. Having met three criteria, the AAO reviewed the totality of the evidence and found the petitioner demonstrated sustained acclaim and eligibility.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.