sustained EB-1A Case: Artificial Intelligence Technology
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, finding the petitioner only met two of the required three evidentiary criteria. The AAO sustained the appeal, concluding that the petitioner also met the criterion for original contributions of major significance based on evidence of his patents, testimonial letters from industry experts, and the impact of his proprietary technology. Having met three criteria, the AAO reviewed the totality of the evidence and found the petitioner demonstrated sustained acclaim and eligibility.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.