EB-1A Sustained โ Athletics (2011): after reviewing the evidence in the aggregate, including
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because after reviewing the evidence in the aggregate, including new evidence submitted on appeal, the AAO determined the petitioner established eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. The decision notes the application of the two-part analysis from Kazarian v. USCIS, where evidence is first counted to see if it meets the regulatory minimum, followed by a final merits determination of whether the petitioner has sustained national or international acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.