EB-1A Sustained โ Athletics (2015): the AAO found the petitioner satisfied three of the ten
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner satisfied three of the ten regulatory criteria, whereas the Director only found two were met. In the final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's extensive documentation of achievements as a competitive runner, including medals, national team membership, and participation in major international events, was sufficient to demonstrate sustained national and international acclaim at the very top of the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.