EB-1A Sustained โ Athletics (2013): the AAO found that the petitioner, a professional water
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner, a professional water skier, successfully demonstrated eligibility under at least three of the regulatory criteria: nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards, judging the work of others, and published material about her work. In the final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the evidence, viewed in totality, established that the petitioner has sustained national or international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of her field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.