sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Athletics
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the director improperly denied the petition based on a narrow, semantic distinction between a "squash professional" and a "squash player/coach." The AAO found that the director failed to fully review the record, which established the beneficiary's intent to continue working in his field and that the role of a squash professional inherently includes playing and coaching duties, making the beneficiary's acclaim relevant.
Criteria Discussed
Intent To Continue Work In The Area Of Extraordinary Ability Sustained National Or International Acclaim
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.