EB-1A Sustained โ Automatic Control And Signal Processing (2007): the AAO found that the evidence submitted previously and on
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the evidence submitted previously and on appeal was sufficient to establish the petitioner's eligibility. Although the director had denied the case, and the AAO found the petitioner's prizes were regional rather than national, the AAO was persuaded by other evidence. Specifically, the petitioner's role as a judge for a national expert group and his substantial peer review work for an international journal were sufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.