Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Biochemical Engineering (2010): the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met at least
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met at least three of the regulatory criteria, reversing the director's denial. The AAO concurred that the petitioner satisfied the 'judging the work of others' criterion through her editorial board and peer review activities, and was persuaded by testimonial evidence highlighting her original, significant contributions to biofilm research.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.