sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Biochemical Engineering
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met at least three of the regulatory criteria, reversing the director's denial. The AAO concurred that the petitioner satisfied the 'judging the work of others' criterion through her editorial board and peer review activities, and was persuaded by testimonial evidence highlighting her original, significant contributions to biofilm research.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.