Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Bioinorganic Chemistry (2014): the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met three of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met three of the required criteria: judging the work of others, original scientific contributions of major significance, and authorship of scholarly articles. Following a final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's extensive documentation demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim and showed that he had risen to the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.