sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Bioinorganic Chemistry
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met three of the required criteria: judging the work of others, original scientific contributions of major significance, and authorship of scholarly articles. Following a final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's extensive documentation demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim and showed that he had risen to the very top of his field.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.