sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Biomaterials
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met the evidentiary criteria. The petitioner demonstrated participation as a judge of others' work through extensive peer-review for scientific journals and established original contributions of major significance through detailed letters of recommendation, a heavy citation record, and authorship of numerous papers in top-ranked journals.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.