sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Biomedical Research
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully demonstrated eligibility under the required criteria. The AAO found that her service on the editorial boards for two journals satisfied the 'judging the work of others' criterion. Additionally, her original scientific contributions were deemed of major significance, supported by numerous testimonial letters from experts and a substantial number of citations to her published work.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.