sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Biomedical Research
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner satisfied at least three of the regulatory criteria. The decision highlights the petitioner's role on editorial boards as evidence of judging the work of others, and her original research on neurogranin as a contribution of major significance, which was supported by laudatory witness letters and a high number of citations (144) to her published work.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.