Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Biomedical Research: the AAO found that the petitioner satisfied at least three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner satisfied at least three of the regulatory criteria. The decision highlights the petitioner's role on editorial boards as evidence of judging the work of others, and her original research on neurogranin as a contribution of major significance, which was supported by laudatory witness letters and a high number of citations (144) to her published work.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.