sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Biomedical Research
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the director improperly narrowed the petitioner's field from 'biomedical research' to 'cancer research.' This error caused the director to exclude significant evidence related to the petitioner's achievements in hypertension research. The AAO concluded that the petitioner's broader field was appropriate and, upon review of all evidence, found that the petitioner met the required criteria.
Criteria Discussed
Receipt Of Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.