EB-1A Sustained โ Biomedical Research (2015): established eligibility for a third evidentiary criterion,
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully demonstrated eligibility for a third evidentiary criterion, 'original contributions of major significance,' which the Director had initially denied. On appeal, the petitioner provided new evidence corroborating his extensive citation record, which, when considered with the totality of the evidence, satisfied the AAO that he had made contributions of major significance and demonstrated sustained national acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.