EB-1A Sustained — Business (2019): the AAO determined the petitioner met a third criterion,
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined the petitioner met a third criterion, published material about his work, in addition to the two criteria (judging and leading/critical role) the Director had already acknowledged. Upon final merits review, the AAO concluded that the totality of the evidence—including his published articles, speaking invitations, and role advising the UK Ministry of Justice—demonstrated sustained national acclaim and established that he is at the top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.