EB-1A Sustained โ Business (2017): the AAO determined that the petitioner met the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the petitioner met the required minimum of three evidentiary criteria, contrary to the Director's initial finding of only one. The AAO found sufficient evidence for the petitioner's role as a judge of the work of others and as the subject of published material in major media. The final merits determination concluded that the petitioner's achievements, particularly his co-founding of a highly recognized renewable energy company, demonstrated sustained acclaim and placed him at the top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.