EB-1A Sustained โ Business (2013): the AAO found the petitioner met three regulatory criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner met three regulatory criteria (published material, original contributions, and leading/critical role). The AAO's final merits determination concluded that the petitioner, described as a "legend" and the "godfather of Chinese floor[ing]" for introducing laminate flooring to China and building successful companies, demonstrated sustained national acclaim and was within the small percentage at the very top of the business field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.