sustained EB-1A Case: Business
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner's evidence met three of the ten regulatory criteria. In its final merits determination, the AAO concluded that the petitioner's career of acclaimed work, including serving as CEO for two companies (one of which was recognized as one of the fastest-growing in the U.S.), commanding high remuneration, holding patents, and receiving corroborating letters from experts, demonstrated sustained national acclaim at the very top of the business field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.