sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Cancer Research
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the petitioner, a cancer researcher, had submitted extensive documentation of her achievements. The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met at least three of the regulatory criteria: judging the work of others, making original scientific contributions of major significance, and authoring scholarly articles.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.