Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Cancer Research (2012): the AAO determined that the petitioner, a cancer
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the petitioner, a cancer researcher, had submitted extensive documentation of her achievements. The AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met at least three of the regulatory criteria: judging the work of others, making original scientific contributions of major significance, and authoring scholarly articles.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.