EB-1A Sustained โ Chemistry: the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner's evidence met the necessary criteria for an alien of extraordinary ability. The decision credited the petitioner's service as a peer reviewer for scientific publications as satisfying the 'judging' criterion. Furthermore, multiple letters from experts established the petitioner's original scientific contributions of major significance to the field of chemistry, demonstrating the required sustained acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.