sustained EB-1A Case: Chess
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the evidence of record sufficient to establish the petitioner's eligibility. The evidence, including impressive national and world chess rankings, an international grandmaster title, news articles, tournament results, and letters from distinguished experts, demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that the petitioner has sustained national or international acclaim and is within the small percentage of individuals who have risen to the very top of the field of chess.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.