sustained EB-1A Case: Circus Performance

MATTER OF A-S-P-P-F-
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: FEB. 8, 2016 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a circus performer, seeks classification as an individual of "extraordinary ability" in the 
arts. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act)§ 203(b)(l)(A); 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(l)(A). The 
Director, Texas Service Center, denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. The 
appeal will be sustained. 
The classification the Petitioner seeks makes visas available to foreign nationals who can demonstrate 
extraordinary ability through sustained national or international acclaim and achievements that have 
been recognized in the area of expertise through extensive documentation. The Director determined 
that the Petitioner had not satisfied the initial evidentiary requirements set forth at 8 C.F.R 
§ 204.5(h)(3), which necessitate a one-time achievement or evidence that meets at least three of ten 
regulatory criteria. On appeal, the Petitioner submits a legal brief and additional material. 
I. LAW 
Section 203(b) of the Act states in pertinent part: 
(1) Priority workers. -- Visas shall first be made available ... to qualified immigrants who 
are aliens described in any of the following subparagraphs (A) through (C): 
(A) Aliens with extraordinary ability. --An alien is described in this subparagraph 
if-
(i) the alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, 
business, or athletics which has been demonstrated by sustained 
national or international acclaim and whose achievements have 
been recognized in the field through extensive documentation, 
(ii) the alien seeks to enter the United States to continue work in the 
area of extraordinary ability, and 
(iii) the alien's entry into the United States will substantially benefit 
prospectively the United States. 
(b)(6)
Matter of A-S-P-P-F-
The term "extraordinary ability" refers only to those individuals in that small percentage who have 
risen to the very top of the field of endeavor. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(2). The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(h)(3) sets forth a multi-part analysis. First, a petitioner can demonstrate sustained acclaim 
and the recognition of his or her achievements in the field through a one-time achievement (that is, a 
major, internationally recognized award). If the petitioner does not submit this evidence, then he or 
she must provide sufficient qualifying documentation that meets at least three of the ten categories 
listed at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)- (x). 
Satisfaction of at least three criteria, however, does not, in and of itself, establish eligibility for this 
classification. See Kazarian v. USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing a two-part review 
where the evidence is first counted and then, if satisfying the required number of criteria, considered 
in the context of a final merits determination). See also Rijal v. USCIS, 772 F.Supp.2d 1339 (W.D. 
Wash. 2011) (affirming our proper application of Kazarian), aff'd, 683 F.3d. 1030 (9th Cir. 2012); 
Visinscaia v. Beers, 4 F.Supp.3d 126, 131-32 (D.D.C. 2013) (finding that we appropriately applied 
the two-step review); Matter of Chawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 376 (AAO 2010) (holding that the 
"truth is to be determined not by the quantity of evidence alone but by its quality" and that we 
examine "each piece of evidence for relevance, probative value, and credibility, both individually 
and within the context of the totality of the evidence, to determine whether the fact to be proven is 
probably true"). 
II. ANALYSIS 
A. Evidentiary Criteria 
The Director found the Petitioner met two of the necessary three criteria listed at 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(h)(3)(i)- (x). Specifically, the Director found that the Petitioner provided published 
material about himself in professional or major trade publications or other major media, as well as 
corroboration of a contribution of major significance in his field. 8 C.F.R § 204.5(h)(3)(iii), (v). 
The Petitioner submitted numerous articles about himself and his motorcycle troupe that have 
appeared in a variety of media outlets, including In addition, the record 
confirms that the Petitioner 's act had the world record for number of motorcyclists 
riding inside of a sphere at one time, thereby setting the bar to which others will aspire. As a result, 
we agree that the Petitioner has satisfied these two criteria. Accordingly, the sole issue on appeal is 
whether the Petitioner meets a third criterion. For the reasons discussed below, the Petitioner 
documented that he performed in a critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation. 
8 C.F.R § 204.5(h)(3)(viii) . 
The Petitioner has corroborated that is an organization with a distinguished reputation 
in the circus world. We must therefore examine the Petitioner's role at and assess the 
nature of his position and his significance to the organization as a whole. The Petitioner has 
provided numerous examples of promotional materials produced by that highlight 
him. A poster for the troupe features a large picture of the 
surrounded by other Latin American performers . In addition, the record contains numerous 
2 
(b)(6)
Matter of A-S-P-P-F-
examples of media attention given to as a result of the Petitioner's record breaking 
act. In 2012, the appeared on in order to 
break the world record live on television. They were joined by the ringmaster, who 
helped host the occasion and assisted in making the episode a promotional event for the circus. The 
Petitioner also submitted many reviews and notices regarding performances, and his 
act is almost always listed as one of the most popular and noteworthy. The importance of the 
Petitioner's act to success demonstrates his critical role in the organization . For 
these reasons , the Petitioner has satisfied the plain language of this criterion. 
B. Summary 
The documentation provided satisfies three regulatory criteria. 
submitted sufficient initial evidence of at least three of the 
§ 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). 
C. Final Merits Determination 
As a result, the Petitioner has 
ten criteria listed at 8 C.F.R . 
The next step is a final merits determination that considers all of the evidence in the context of 
whether or not the Petitioner has demonstrated: (1) a "level of expertise indicating that the 
individual is one of that small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor, " 
and (2) "that the alien has sustained national or international acclaim and that his or her 
achievements have been recognized in the field of expertise." § 203(b)(1)(A) of the Act; 8 C.F.R. § 
204.5(h)(2), (h)(3). See also Kazarian, 596 F.3d at 1119-20. 
As noted above, the Petitioner has made contributions of major significance in the field by breaking the 
world record in for number of riders in a By setting this benchmark and 
establishing himself as the best in the world, the Petitioner proved himself to be one of the small 
percentage who have risen to the very top ofthe field of endeavor. Similarly, we note that the Petitioner 
has submitted numerous examples of national and international acclaim received for his 
accomplishments. In addition to his appearance on the Petitioner and his troupe are featured in 
numerous popular publications. Above, we noted the article about the 
act. They have also appeared , however , on full page cover spreads in 
The Petitioner himself is the focus of an article in the "Interview" section 
of . On appeal , the Petitioner provides circulation data and background information 
about the publications , which indicate a breadth of acclaim. When considered in their totality, the 
materials show the Petitioner has risen to the very top of his field of endeavor and has received the 
necessary national or international acclaim to qualify as an individual of extraordinary ability. 
III. CONCLUSION 
The Petitioner submitted the requisite initial evidence and showed his extraordinary ability when 
considered in a final merits decision. § 203(b )(1 )(A)(i) of the Act. He confirmed that he seeks to 
enter the United States to continue to work in his area of extraordinary ability. § 203(b)(l)(A)(ii) of 
the Act. By demonstrating that he seeks to continue to work in his area of extraordinary abilit y, and 
3 
Matter of A-S-P-P-F-
there being no indication otherwise, we are satisfied that the Petitioner's entry will substantially 
benefit prospectively the United States. § 203(b )(1 )(A)(iii). Therefore, the Petitioner has met the 
burden of proof necessary to establish eligibility for the benefit sought. §§ 203(b)(l)(A) & 291 of 
the Act. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
Cite as Matter of A-S-P-P-F-, ID# 15390 (AAO Feb. 8, 2016) 
4