EB-1A Sustained โ Computer Science (2016): the petitioner provided additional evidence on appeal to
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided additional evidence on appeal to meet a third regulatory criterion, specifically demonstrating a high salary in relation to others in the field. The Director had initially found only two criteria were met. Upon review of all the evidence, including the petitioner's highly cited scholarly articles and peer review activities, the AAO concluded in the final merits determination that he had demonstrated extraordinary ability.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.