Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Computer Science And Mathematics (2012): the AAO found that the petitioner met three regulatory
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner met three regulatory criteria and, upon a final merits determination, demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim. The evidence, including numerous scholarly articles, citations by independent researchers, and strong reference letters detailing his significant contributions, was sufficient to establish that he is among the small percentage at the top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.