EB-1A Sustained — Computer Science (2019): the AAO determined the petitioner met a third evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined the petitioner met a third evidentiary criterion, 'leading or critical role', in addition to the two previously acknowledged by the Director. Upon final merits determination, the AAO found the totality of the evidence, including his peer review activities, patented contributions, presentations at international conferences, and critical role for a distinguished organization, was sufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.