sustained EB-1A Case: Dance And Choreography
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the petitioner, a dancer and choreographer, successfully met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO found that the petitioner's Canadian theatre awards satisfied the 'lesser nationally recognized awards' criterion, his work on various productions met the 'display at artistic exhibitions or showcases' criterion, and his role as chief choreographer for a distinguished company fulfilled the 'leading or critical role' criterion. Upon final merits determination, this evidence was sufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim and that the petitioner is among the small percentage at the top of his field.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.