Sustained
EB-1A
EB-1A Sustained — Electronic Engineering: the AAO found the petitioner satisfied at least three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner satisfied at least three regulatory criteria. Evidence of his service as a peer reviewer and editorial board member satisfied the 'judging' criterion. Furthermore, the AAO determined that his invention of Defected Ground Structure (DGS) technology, attested to by numerous experts, constituted an original contribution of major significance to his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.