sustained
EB-1A
sustained EB-1A Case: Electronic Engineering
Avoid this EB-1A denial in your own petition.
No credit card. Generate your first draft in minutes.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner satisfied at least three regulatory criteria. Evidence of his service as a peer reviewer and editorial board member satisfied the 'judging' criterion. Furthermore, the AAO determined that his invention of Defected Ground Structure (DGS) technology, attested to by numerous experts, constituted an original contribution of major significance to his field.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.